On 02/11/2013 11:40 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
On 2/11/13 11:19 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
 From the looks of it there needs to be an evaluation of what is going.

1) There are fundamental changes in the works, which until now have not been
discussed. I for one had no knowledge of the Wiki entry.

I've pointed to it at least twice, once just yesterday and once maybe a month 
ago,
both on the developers list. I didn't think I should post anything about it to 
the
user's list since they aren't using the versions in question yet.


Yet you point users at it:

http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/481769


3) Change is not bad, but it should be managed. Right now it looks like bug 
fixes and
fundamental changes are happening together. I would prefer to see some sort of 
branch
naming/tagging strategy that would isolate a bug fix branch from the testing 
branch.

I fear that anything more complicated than what we are doing will result in 
nothing
getting done. Locally I make a ton of branches, but I merge them into working 
before
pushing up. So each commit should be pretty focused topic-wise. I don't really 
see
the utility for a separate bug-fix public branch. Why is it bad to keep doing 
things
as we've been doing for years, having bleeding edge (bug fixes and new stuff - 
trunk
or working) and discrete releases?

Because it has been an issue in the past and I dealt with it and now I am fed up with the framework blowing up when you are just trying to get a bug fix. Given the move to git and the implied ease of branching it would seem to be that maintaining discrete branches would be the way to go. I fail to see how maintaining a stable branch is a bad thing. Yes I know about WebUpdate, but that has not kept up in quite some time.


Paul





--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]

Reply via email to