On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 05:18:31PM -0000, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > "H.Merijn Brand" wrote in perl.daily-build.reports : > > 29220 Configuration (common) none > > ----------- --------------------------------------------------------- > > O O O O O F > > O O O O O F -Duse64bitint > > O O O O O F -Duselongdouble > > O O O O O F -Dusemorebits > > Do those failures mean that Dave's fix was incomplete, and should we > reinstate a workaround similar at patches 29182 and 29184 ? > > (note that I don't reproduce the failures on Linux, so I'd appreciate > more details) > > > O O O O O O -Duseithreads > > O O O O O O -Duseithreads -Duse64bitint > > O O O O O O -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble > > O O O O O O -Duseithreads -Dusemorebits > >| | | | | +- LC_ALL = en_US.utf8 -DDEBUGGING > >| | | | +--- PERLIO = perlio -DDEBUGGING > >| | | +----- PERLIO = stdio -DDEBUGGING > >| | +------- LC_ALL = en_US.utf8 > >| +--------- PERLIO = perlio > > +----------- PERLIO = stdio > > > > Locally applied patches: > > DEVEL > > SMOKE29220 > > > > Failures: (common-args) none > > [en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING > > [en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Duse64bitint > > [en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Duselongdouble > > [en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Dusemorebits > > ../lib/strict.t.........................FAILED 84-85 > > ../lib/subs.t...........................FAILED 2 > > ../lib/warnings.t.......................FAILED 123-124 138 145-147 155 > > 158 310 > > 455 499-500 > > ../t/run/fresh_perl.t...................FAILED 48
I'm getting similar failures with Solaris, but, so far, I've not been able to reproduce from a command-line. Steve Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
