On 11 Dec 2010, at 16:47 , Jon Solworth wrote:
>       Are you comparing two classes of academics, those working
> or hard problems and those working on today's problems?

Not really, I'm comparing those working on hard problems and those working on 
sufficiently small subsets that they become almost irrelevant.

>       If so, I'm not sure that they are working on different problems,
> it seems to me that they are looking at different ways of attacking
> the same tough problem.  But the second class has so many more
> constraints than the first class that it is very difficult to obtain full 
> solutions.
> Thus, solutions are partial.

I am not sure I agree with that.  One of the saddest moments in my academic 
life was realising that the choice of PhD is dictated for the majority of 
non-brilliant students (of which, sadly, I was part) not by the advancement of 
science but by the fastest route to achieve a thesis which will pass muster.  
You therefore look for problems which are obscure, hidden somewhere and with 
next to no chance of having any importance except to close a border case.  The 
impression I have is: lots of border cases in academia when it comes to 
security.

Is there a lack of smart researchers willing to tackle security in universities 
or are they all being poached by industry and money?

>       Now the question is whether these partial solutions extend to
> useful solutions?  Maybe.  But the history in security is not good.

No, it is not.

>       Because the constraints are reduced (and because complexity
> matters so much in security), it seems to me that the first class has
> a much better chance of solving these problems than the second.

Yes, and no.  Are we sure the complexity we see is not comparable to the 
Ptolemaic model? Are we trying to keep saving a model which is flawed from day 
one but since it still produces papers (and funding) in both academia and 
industry then nobody really has an interest in throwing it away (including 
myself no doubt)?

Arrigo

_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave

Reply via email to