I don't agree, this is more like finding a rifle and knowing it has smart components and being able to classify the weapon because it has an orange stripe sprinkled with a software taggant. It has forensic value, not masking the threat.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Konrads Smelkovs <[email protected] > wrote: > Was difficult to read your piece, but if I understand the gist, then > doesn't your proposal suffer from the same problem as toy guns that > were supposed to have a non-removable one-inch-wide orange stripe > running down both sides of the barrel and the front end of the barrel? > if I take my AK-47 and paint it brightly, cops won't shoot. > -- > Konrads Smelkovs > Applied IT sorcery. > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:10 PM, dave aitel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://cybersecpolitics.blogspot.com/2016/03/a-technical-scheme-for-watermarking.html > > > > It'd be great to hear from some non-US people in the industry as to > > whether they think this sort of thing is doable on their end. Likewise, > > it's not clear what parts of a technical proposal are most important? > > Are we most worried about non-state actors pretending to be State > > actors, or having a high confidence level in our result? > > > > In any case, hopefully ya'll enjoyed reading it! > > > > -dave > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dailydave mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave > _______________________________________________ > Dailydave mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave > -- Thanks, Kevin
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
