PKI for APT then :) -- Konrads Smelkovs Applied IT sorcery.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Kevin Noble <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't agree, this is more like finding a rifle and knowing it has smart > components and being able to classify the weapon because it has an orange > stripe sprinkled with a software taggant. It has forensic value, not > masking the threat. > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Konrads Smelkovs > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Was difficult to read your piece, but if I understand the gist, then >> doesn't your proposal suffer from the same problem as toy guns that >> were supposed to have a non-removable one-inch-wide orange stripe >> running down both sides of the barrel and the front end of the barrel? >> if I take my AK-47 and paint it brightly, cops won't shoot. >> -- >> Konrads Smelkovs >> Applied IT sorcery. >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:10 PM, dave aitel <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > http://cybersecpolitics.blogspot.com/2016/03/a-technical-scheme-for-watermarking.html >> > >> > It'd be great to hear from some non-US people in the industry as to >> > whether they think this sort of thing is doable on their end. Likewise, >> > it's not clear what parts of a technical proposal are most important? >> > Are we most worried about non-state actors pretending to be State >> > actors, or having a high confidence level in our result? >> > >> > In any case, hopefully ya'll enjoyed reading it! >> > >> > -dave >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Dailydave mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave >> _______________________________________________ >> Dailydave mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave > > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Kevin _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
