This article in the New Yorker seems to align well with your explanation of cyberwar as a systemic disruption of ideology.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-real-paranoia-inducing-purpose-of-russian-hacks Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 28, 2016, at 6:36 PM, dave aitel <[email protected]> wrote: > > <nitrozeus.PNG> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiV6am2lNTQ. You'll notice in this Usenix > talk from 2012 I inadvertently blow Nitro Zeus, which came out in that > ZeroDays movie recently. I honestly don't write my talks all by myself, but > you'll notice "we" call out Wikileaks as being a cyber weapon as opposed to > everyone else's seeming fascination with HackingTeam or whatever the > boogieman of the day is. > > People and bonobo monkeys are fascinated by sex - and it's easy to get > wrapped around the sex aspects of Wikileaks, but it's hard to ignore that > what he wrote in his manifesto was a very advanced conceptual understanding > about cyber war, which he then continues to execute to this day. Did or did > not the head of the DNC have to resign this week, in part due to his actions, > even if all he provided was cover and a defined modus operandi? Anyways, > unlike a lot of people, I actually read his manifesto and one thing I learned > was that cyberwar attacks ideology best. This is a key feature of how the > whole domain works. > <ideology.PNG> > The DNC is an ideology. It's something you can believe in, or not. But so is > ISIS? So is Immunity? > -dave > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dailydave mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
