>>>>> "PH" == Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> writes:
PH> From our presentation: PH> What should be in the doc? PH> 1. Copy whole DANE-for-TLS RFC and make needed changes PH> 2. Copy structure of DANE-for-TLS RFC and point to it but don’t copy much PH> 3. Say “we assume you read and understood DANE-for-TLS, and here are the relevant differences” I'm leaning about 129/127 in favour of 3 over 2. (Or should that be for 11 over 10? :) But please do not choose option 1! -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
