[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [dane] How should draft-hoffman..." ] > Mostly 3. > > The main difference is how TLSA records are located, right? Something like > "lhs._at.rhs" instead of "_port._proto.name". The validation rules are > PKIX-based, not TLS-based, so they can be re-used for S/MIME. > > So it seems like the S/MIME draft should just say something like: > 1. Here's how you find a TLSA record for an email address (replaces Section 3 > of RFC 6698) > 2. Everything else is the same as in RFC 6698.
I'm in favor for that too. Keep it nice and short. grtz Miek
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
