On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:51, Paul Hoffman wrote: > I'm starting this as a new thread because Richard conflated two topics *and* > missed the fact that there is already a WG document. > > The question becomes what the registration of an RRtype "means". If it means > the bits on the wire of the *response* and their semantics, then I think the > S/MIME document can use the TLSA RRtype. If an RRtype also means the bits on > the wire of the request and response, we can't. > > Personally, I think that the RRtype is defined just by the bits in the > response, so we could reuse, but others might disagree. >
In my naivete, I've interpreted the RRType to define the bits in the response. Which explains why I've been confused why draft-hoffman-dane-smime can't re-use TLSA. - m&m Matt Miller - <[email protected]> Cisco Systems, Inc.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
