[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [dane] Reusing TLSA..." ] > > The question becomes what the registration of an RRtype "means". If it > > means the bits on the wire of the *response* and their semantics, then I > > think the S/MIME document can use the TLSA RRtype. If an RRtype also means > > the bits on the wire of the request and response, we can't. > > > > Personally, I think that the RRtype is defined just by the bits in the > > response, so we could reuse, but others might disagree. > > > > In my naivete, I've interpreted the RRType to define the bits in the > response. Which explains why I've been confused why draft-hoffman-dane-smime > can't re-use TLSA.
The question does not even have the rdata part.
To me it looks if we are in violent agreement: re-use TLSA in dane-smime.
Regards,
--
Miek Gieben http://miek.nl
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
