In message <[email protected]>, James Cloos writes: > >>>>> "PW" == Paul Wouters <[email protected]> writes: > > PW> If only we had decided not to use protoport prefixing.... > > What does that have to do with anything? :/ > > An RR is defined by its wire format. A TLSA RR is still a TLSA RR no > matter where it happens to be in the DNS. > > Just like any other RR. Eg: > > foo.example.org in ptr bar > > is still a PTR RR. No matter how unlikely it should be that anyone > might dig(1) it.
Well a PTR record is a record that points to another domain name but is not follow when looked up unlike a CNAME. It was defined for use anywhere in the DNS not just in the IN-ADDR.ARPA tree. So while your conclusion is correct your argument is invalid. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
