Hi Viktor,
At 22:25 19-04-2013, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Lack of RFC WG consensus does not trump simple deductive logic,
which remains irrefutably true even if the group did not explicitly
endorse it.
You repeat the same assertion, but still with no justification,
what is the change you speak of?
I expressed my opinion. I can be wrong. I'll explain my point of view:
(a) The working group has to decide what to do about this erratum.
(b) I do not have to convince the working group about whether to approve the
erratum or not to approve it.
(c) I read the messages on this thread and I gathered that my opinion would
not make any difference. I am ok with that.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
