On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:00:22AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Ond?ej Sur? <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > a) do nothing
> > b) accept errata as is
> > c) start work on RFC6698bis and include this change
>
> (c) seems good, and Viktor has already said that he is willing to start on it.
Sure, but I started work on an "operational guidance" I.-D. If we're
updating 6698, the content would be quite different. Which is the immediate
priority? A 6698 update or an operational guidance draft?
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
