-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 5/21/13 2:05 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > I've been informally asking around about what people might think > about requesting that ietf.org add support for DANE. Support isn't > there yet in the browsers but folks have to deploy it on the server > side and I think it might as well be us. I know it's likely not > going to be be as simple just asking, but I'd hear what the WG > thinks about the idea.
+1 to eating our own dogfood. In this case, what exactly does that mean? DANE support for the website(s) (HTTPS), mailing lists (SMTP), chatrooms (XMPP), other? Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRm9QzAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pz34QAJTar762fZ64ed8WzZ21NF1p F9XYCinXT6LPiborRFkPrXzcqNbGTlccmfr7VJyxlz2lfranzXfdjiEc9KRG4lGG dL9s5Q3cX2BAWRqiQOPRFpT6wpRjvDwL5OjRBbWkLILyi5tUJdsPl+iKGKI4LVZ/ 9Knx5JHKM11NR2Y6Db1zYGiuaiQxHTrCSfH0o6qAqVH58AWppY+7H7C4byGplfrS foDs2w8ec0DNndvFk7rSs6ixdaWFFZ6zBOHLjXX6ifd00WxJb7XhweZhzHvP+uYN 9DmB/cVW5JTw9yqPZy/2Lypx65SsxfP9XAyTdRR6otkQj5M1faPMBIm5iDXHH3kI c9yyE+Wvo6xxyM/Hee98WDWcJpHvkB4+LVfvKA8LL8GdJnICBf/ysv0rgK7L980A jcp2piWZrPrZq9yed9tl4czhA/HiGNGO42/jc/pF3QknksxOvt5nvhz1UCs6tDQv /kcrv7lCSN58Q5fe50DWK4HqWq8HSzNMoVRGFk8OFV7yc5mrKkupvjiNQ89fD7f5 EQHfcnPU5dzKxY1S01VsfskL/rz8g3h+Ujv0COasnR3MV9/eMb9t/c2JG1rsZkVZ ZezScCNuqWEeTqyJqu3NknnrplxY9Ry3o2cMOHEN2m95OoBq32hqoRvsrO14fzcJ duX8RGO0nu3y1VH9vnca =vs/M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
