dane  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [dane] Putting HPKP header into DNS - Re: Why shut down the DANE group? Martin Thomson
  • Re: [dane] Putting HPKP header into DNS - Re: Why shut down the DANE group? Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [dane] Putting HPKP header into DNS - Re: Why shut down the DANE group? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Putting HPKP header into DNS - Re: Why shut down the DANE group? Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Geoff Huston
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Warren Kumari
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? John Levine
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? John R Levine
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? John R Levine
  • Re: [dane] Why shut down the DANE group? Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dane] Meeting plans for Buenos Aires? Benno Overeinder
• [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated James Cloos
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated John R Levine
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Wiley, Glen
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Sandoche Balakrichenan
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated Kim Alvefur
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] DANE Client Authentication draft updated John Levine
• [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Hosnieh Rafiee
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Dan York
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Hosnieh Rafiee
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Patrick Ben Koetter
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Osterweil, Eric
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Hosnieh Rafiee
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Wiley, Glen
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Osterweil, Eric
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] any statistics of deployment available? Osterweil, Eric
  • [dane] Added DANE stats to Deploy360 page - Re: any statistics of deployment available? Dan York
• [dane] SMIMEA test vectors Garfinkel, Simson L.
  • Re: [dane] SMIMEA test vectors Osterweil, Eric
  • Re: [dane] SMIMEA test vectors Garfinkel, Simson L.
• [dane] DANE TLSA support in OpenSSL 1.1.0 coming soon... Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] DANE TLSA support in OpenSSL 1.1.0 coming soon... Wes Hardaker
  • Re: [dane] DANE TLSA support in OpenSSL 1.1.0 coming soon... Viktor Dukhovni
• [dane] Any comment? Bounding of authentication and authorization Hosnieh Rafiee
• [dane] a new draft?? Bounding of authentication and authorization Hosnieh Rafiee
• [dane] Speaking of mailbox names in the DNS John R Levine
• [dane] Is there some activity for Pointer-to-Server Christian Rößner
  • Re: [dane] Is there some activity for Pointer-to-Server John R Levine
  • Re: [dane] Is there some activity for Pointer-to-Server Peter Gutmann
• [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) ietf-dane
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Shumon Huque
  • Re: [dane] New version of tls-dnssec-chain draft (-02) Viktor Dukhovni
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-06.txt internet-drafts
• [dane] RFC 7673 on Using DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) TLSA Records with SRV Records rfc-editor
• [dane] RFC 7672 on SMTP Security via Opportunistic DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer Security (TLS) rfc-editor
• [dane] RFC 7671 on The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol: Updates and Operational Guidance rfc-editor
• [dane] Skiing Down the ALPS 🎿🏂🗻⛰🏔🌄: Alternative Local-Part Synthesis for DANE (draft-seantek-dane-alps-00.txt) Sean Leonard
  • Re: [dane] Skiing Down the ALPS 🎿🏂🗻⛰🏔🌄: Alternative Local-Part Synthesis for DANE (draft-seantek-dane-alps-00.txt) Warren Kumari
  • Re: [dane] Skiing Down the ALPS 🎿🏂🗻⛰🏔🌄: Alternative Local-Part Synthesis for DANE (draft-seantek-dane-alps-00.txt) John Levine
• [dane] 3 drafts now in RFC Editor state. Warren Kumari
• [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways John Levine
  • Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Sean Leonard
  • Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways John R Levine
  • Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Jeremy Harris
  • Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Wiley, Glen
  • Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Sean Leonard
  • Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Wiley, Glen
  • Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Sean Leonard
• Re: [dane] Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey John Levine
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey manning
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey manning
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey John C Klensin
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] provisioning assumptions, was PGP security models, was Summary John Levine
  • Re: [dane] provisioning assumptions, was PGP security models, was Summary Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Randy Bush
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Randy Bush
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Sam Hartman
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Sam Hartman
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey Joe Abley
• [dane] Published Rules for equivalent local-parts Sean Leonard
  • Re: [dane] Published Rules for equivalent local-parts Olafur Gudmundsson
  • Re: [dane] Published Rules for equivalent local-parts Sean Leonard
  • Re: [dane] Published Rules for equivalent local-parts John R. Levine
  • Re: [dane] Published Rules for equivalent local-parts Paul Wouters
• [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Olafur Gudmundsson
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Brian Dickson
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Michael Kliewe
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Rose, Scott
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Jakob Schlyter
  • Re: [dane] E-mail Cert left hand side -- what the chairs think the consensus is Olafur Gudmundsson
• [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard The IESG
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard Petr Spacek
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard Simon Josefsson
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard Simon Josefsson
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard manning
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard Petr Spacek
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt internet-drafts
  • Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt Paul Wouters
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-smime-09.txt internet-drafts
• [dane] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-04.txt Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-04.txt Jakob Schlyter
  • Re: [dane] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-04.txt Stephen Farrell
  • Re: [dane] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-04.txt Paul Wouters
• [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-04.txt internet-drafts
• [dane] Not meeting in Yokohama. Warren Kumari
• [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed lst_hoe02
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Peter Koch
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Paul Wouters
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed Patrik Fältström
  • Re: [dane] Delivery of email if MX is not signed lst_hoe02
  • Re: [dane] DANE for MX host via insecure MX RR? (was: Delivery of email if MX is not signed) Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] DANE for MX host via insecure MX RR? Michael Ströder
  • Re: [dane] DANE for MX host via insecure MX RR? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] DANE for MX host via insecure MX RR? Michael Ströder
  • Re: [dane] DANE for MX host via insecure MX RR? Viktor Dukhovni
  • Re: [dane] DANE for MX host via insecure MX RR? Michael Ströder
• [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Carsten Strotmann
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Olafur Gudmundsson
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Patrik Löhr
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Olafur Gudmundsson
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Warren Kumari
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Warren Kumari
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Mark Andrews
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Warren Kumari
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Mark Andrews
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Patrik Löhr
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Warren Kumari
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Patrik Löhr
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Richard Lamb
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Patrik Löhr
  • Re: [dane] DNS-Record type for SMIMEA Warren Kumari
• [dane] Protocol Action: 'Updates to and Operational Guidance for the DANE Protocol' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dane-ops-16.txt) The IESG

• Earlier messages
• Later messages