(Sorry if this has already been raised, but...) The digest identifiers in draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-02 seem a little silly, in that nobody else in the world really seems to care that these are variants of SHA2. The standard practice across many libraries is to just use some variant of "SHA-XXX", where XXX=256,384,512.
OpenSSL: shaXXX WebCrypto: SHA-XXX BouncyCastle: SHAXXXDigest CNG: BCRYPT_SHAXXX_ALGORITHM PKCS#11: CKM_SHAXXX So I would suggest we just change these to "SHA-256" and "SHA-512". --Richard
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
