On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:29:39PM -0500, Richard Barnes wrote:
> So I would suggest we just change these to "SHA-256" and "SHA-512".
It is not possible to find digest names that universally match
prior practice. So likely any recognizable non-confusing names
are sufficient.
For example in OpenSSL the names are:
#define SN_sha256 "SHA256"
#define LN_sha256 "sha256"
with no hyphens at all. So, perhaps surprisingly, I have
no objects to the digest names, it is clear what they mean,
and no single choice matches established practice.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
