On 2014-10-31 09:25, Paul Wouters wrote:
The problem has not gone away though. It would help if you could
state
publicly whether any of your suggestions might fall under planned or
actual IPR by Versign? If so, a statement with license conditions
compatible with the IETF process would be useful. Without any such
statements, I'm even feeling uncomfortable reading anything you
wrote,
let alone accepting any contributions from members of your company.
Rest assured Verisign is going to follow the IETF IPR disclosure
procedures in the way that our experts in this area deem appropriate -
we're well aware there are clear consequences of not doing so -- and
there are a lot of folks here that are trying to do the right thing.
That said, you're welcome to follow those procedures yourself if
something concerns you.
So as it stands, I am against any of your suggestions, without having
read them.
Perhaps give them a read such you can have an informed position and
useful contribution for this discussion? :-)
Kind regards,
-danny
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
