On 1 nov 2014, at 13:33, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yeah, I would say so. I think this is the case most akin to the TLSA model.
>> I would say:
>> 0 == use TLSA-style DANE
>> 1 == look for info from a service that is described by NAPTR
>> 2 == Look for info served from a WebFinger service.
>
> What is the meaning of the associated *DATA* field? Why should
> this be an SMIMEA record. I think this is misuse of that record.
I believe the CERT RR would be more appropriate for redirects to other access
methods. Or perhaps the proposed URI RR (draft-faltstrom-uri).
The proposal is similar to publishing an MX RR with an extra option to indicate
that X.400 should be used for delivery.
jakob
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
