On Jan 07, 2015, at 20:15, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I read the DANE-SRV record, had some nits (Victor also caught >> 'em), and support progressing the draft. > > I think you're saying that the associated revisions can be made as > part of moving into IETF LC, and don't need further WG review? Is > that right? But being new around here, I am not quite sure. Yes - let’s get this one out the door. spt _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
