Dear wg members, This is a belated summary of the WGLC (sorry my fault) The SRV document got number of good reviews and editors have updated the document to reflect the comments received, version -11 should be final WG version and we plan to advance it to the IESG.
SMTP document did not get as many reviews, only 3 that I can see Paul Hoffman (no comments), Dan York (not a thorough review) and Sean Turner, who had number of comments. There github repository contains a version of the document that addresses all the comments received. Editors please post ASAP. Chairs plan on advancing this document as well, but we would really like if couple of people take a fresh look and tell us the document is as ready as we think it is. Both the SRV and SMTP document have a dependency relationship with -OPS document thus we will start a WGLC on that document in the near future, Olafur > On Nov 12, 2014, at 11:09 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear wg members > > This email message starts a three week WGLC ending on December 4’th at 23:59 > UTC. > > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dane/draft-ietf-dane-srv > <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dane/draft-ietf-dane-srv> > and > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-13 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-13> > > These two document are specifying related uses of DANE. > Please review the documents carefully, in particular we want to make sure the > documents have no > contradictions. > > We need at least 5 members of the working group to state in public that they > have read the documents and > state what is needed to fixed before the documents are advanced. > > I will act as document shepherd for these two documents. > > Olafur & Warren > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
