> -----Original Message----- > From: dane [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 7:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* > review. > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:34:53PM -0800, Jim Schaad wrote: > > > 4. In section 3, I strongly urge that the problem of case folding of user > > names be acknowledged. I don't insist that the problem be solved. (I > > believe that it is not really solvable.) However I strongly field > > that the existence of the problem needs to be stated along with the fact > that there > > is no intention to solve it. The problem statement can also easily state > > that this is a problem ONLY for US ASCII systems and not for UNICODE > > systems as these are less likely to allow for case folding in the first place. > > (Does not need to be in section 3, but that seems to be the logical > > place to put it.) > > The problem *is* solvable. Case-insensitive receiving domains, could publish > a case-folded version of the user name (hashed with a tag that prevents > collisions in other domains, I proposed a concrete scheme some months > back). Senders could for the unmodified lookup key, and then for the tagged > case-folded key.
And what happens in the following case: I am on a case sensitive receiving domain. There are two recipients - JimSch and jimsch on the domain. jimsch has a record but JimSch does not. I now try and send mail to JimSch but get a key for jimsch. Jim > > The main question is whether we can reach consensus on wanting to solve it > (for OPENPGPKEY and SMIMEA alike). Solving is the easy part. > > -- > Viktor. > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
