Why are we arguing about this? We can support both seperate zones and combined zones. Just use "_openpgpkey DNAME _mailbox" if you want to collape the number of zones.
Mark In message <20150313221955.GB3479@localhost>, Nico Williams writes: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:23:34PM -0000, John Levine wrote: > > I see that in dane-openpgpkey, the name on the record is > > > > <hash>._openpgpkey.domain > > > > and in dane-smime, the name is: > > > > <hash>._smimecert.domain > > > > These are two different names for the same mailbox. Since they use > > the same hash, wouldn't it be a better idea for both of them and any > > future RRs that use hashed mailboxes to use the same name? > > > > <hash>._mailbox.domain > > I prefer the latter. > > > PS: The payment record draft that showed up a few days ago uses _pmta, > > but again, same mailbox, should be at the same name. > > If they are all the same thing, they should all be using the same > domainname. If it could make sense to separate them, then not. But I > think these are all the same thing. > > Nico > -- > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
