On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:24:40PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> [ Random top post ]
> So, it feels like we are approaching a compromise / consensus on this
> bit (which is good, because this part was the bit we were least in
> agreement on)
>
> Let's give this a bit more time to settle, then I'm planning on a very
> short WGLC, restricted just to this question, and with a "We'll
> assume you are OK with this, unless you say otherwise".
Was consensus reached on the _prefix for the sha224 hashes? Distinct
for SMIMEA, OPENPGPKEY, ... or unified?
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
