On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 7/2/15 8:34 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>
>>  So for me, the main obstacle is still the owner-label, which is
>>> the same for both OPENPGP and SMIMEA.
>>>
>>
>> No one has given me feedback (positive or negative) on the "lowercase if
>> ascii, normalise otherwise", then lookup base32/split or using hash,
>> that was advised to me by some of the EAI people.
>>
>
> What exactly do we mean by "normalise" here? I don't see anything about
> normalization (in the Unicode sense) in draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey.


It's not in the draft; we were discussing this in Buenos Aires with Paul.

I believe it was suggested that we use Unicode default case folding
(Section 3.13 - http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode7.0.0/ch03.pdf#G33992
).

I'm not convinced that we should touch non-ASCII mailbox username.

As for ASCII - the only well-known case for locale-sensitive mapping is the
Turkish dotted/dotless i. If we lowercased capital I according to Turkish
locale, we'd get U+0131 (small letter dotless i) which is not ASCII; see
above. So my preference is to "lowercase if ascii, otherwise verbatim".

.wil
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to