On 6/30/15 6:51 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > I actually also do not really understand the decision, other than the > authors seeing a hot potato. I still believe it would be in the interest > of both the OPENPGPKEY and the SMIMEA drafts that they continue to > discuss and attempt to use the same lookup mechanism. > iI suspect many software implementors that will implement one, will > also implement the other. Since it is mostly a different format for the > same idea, attempt to encrypt emails when a public key is advertised.
Yes, to all of this. I really don't understand the reasoning behind this decision, mostly because the only explanation given has been pretty perfunctory. Surely a better option right now would be to find additional editors. Melinda _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
