> On Jul 9, 2015, at 9:04 AM, Peter van Dijk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Glen, > > On 8 Jul 2015, at 23:28, Wiley, Glen wrote: > >> How would folks feel about updating the SMIMEA draft to use language similar >> to section 3 in the OPENPGPKEY draft: > > As I understand it, the SMIMEA draft, and *especially this part*, is on hold > until we figure out what’s right for OPENPGPKEY, and perhaps even gain some > operational experience with it. It would seem pointless to copy this language > now, especially with the amount of disagreement people are having with the > language as it stands now — we would just keep copying changes, better to > just wait until OPENPGPKEY has settled down.
To be fair, I think I counted about 10 people on the list who urged to proceed with the SMIMEA draft. In this case, I think the perfect is the enemy of the good. Eric _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
