Thanks Peter. My hope here is that we settle the question for both as quickly as we can and move forward with both drafts. The goal in mind when I suggested that is to try to nudge folks toward settling the question.
I agree that we don¹t want to ³keep copying changes². -- Glen Wiley Principal Engineer Verisign, Inc. (571) 230-7917 http://vbsdcon.com A5E5 E373 3C75 5B3E 2E24 6A0F DC65 2354 9946 C63A On 7/9/15, 9:04 AM, "Peter van Dijk" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hello Glen, > >On 8 Jul 2015, at 23:28, Wiley, Glen wrote: > >> How would folks feel about updating the SMIMEA draft to use language >> similar to section 3 in the OPENPGPKEY draft: > >As I understand it, the SMIMEA draft, and *especially this part*, is on >hold until we figure out what¹s right for OPENPGPKEY, and perhaps even >gain some operational experience with it. It would seem pointless to >copy this language now, especially with the amount of disagreement >people are having with the language as it stands now ‹ we would just >keep copying changes, better to just wait until OPENPGPKEY has settled >down. > >Kind regards, >-- >Peter van Dijk >PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ > >_______________________________________________ >dane mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
