Thanks Peter.

My hope here is that we settle the question for both as quickly as we can
and move forward with both drafts.  The goal in mind when I suggested that
is to try to nudge folks toward settling the question.

I agree that we don¹t want to ³keep copying changes².
-- 
Glen Wiley

Principal Engineer
Verisign, Inc.
(571) 230-7917

http://vbsdcon.com

A5E5 E373 3C75 5B3E 2E24
6A0F DC65 2354 9946 C63A




On 7/9/15, 9:04 AM, "Peter van Dijk" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hello Glen,
>
>On 8 Jul 2015, at 23:28, Wiley, Glen wrote:
>
>> How would folks feel about updating the SMIMEA draft to use language
>> similar to section 3 in the OPENPGPKEY draft:
>
>As I understand it, the SMIMEA draft, and *especially this part*, is on
>hold until we figure out what¹s right for OPENPGPKEY, and perhaps even
>gain some operational experience with it. It would seem pointless to
>copy this language now, especially with the amount of disagreement
>people are having with the language as it stands now ‹ we would just
>keep copying changes, better to just wait until OPENPGPKEY has settled
>down.
>
>Kind regards,
>-- 
>Peter van Dijk
>PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/
>
>_______________________________________________
>dane mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to