On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:54:13PM -0800, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 7/28/15 2:15 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > The data will need to (and I expect will) fit into 16K so, it can
> > go into a TLS handshake message. To that end, and in any case,
> > the extension should I think support DNS name "compression", and
> > should be encouraged to do use it (the draft says otherwise at
> > present).
>
> Adam's original proposal included a name compression mechanism
> (Adam Langley wrote the initial draft a few years ago, and we've
> picked it up with his blessing). We decided to drop it because
> it adds some complexity (and the possibility of error) with
> questionable benefit, given that signatures are going to be the
> bigger consumer of space in the extension.
See my follow-up message. I think you should reconsider.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
