On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 02:18:39PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >mail.example.com. IN A 192.168.1.1
> >_426._tcp.mail.example.om. IN TLSA ....
_25._tcp for SMTP, no idea where _426 is from.
> >What seems to have happened in the tests that Jan did was that IF the MX
> > was not signed, BUT the TLSA was signed and validated correctly, THEN
> > postfix did _NOT_ deliver the email. At all.
The tests were badly executed or profoundly misinterpreted.
> >I think that behaviour is wrong, and am unsure whether it is a bug in
> > postfix or whether it is a bug in the spec.
Neither.
> > That would be a bug in postfix? The spec states:
Would be, but is not, because Postfix does not behave as claimed.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
