Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:52:34PM +0200, Michael Ströder wrote: >> People should be prepared that some MTAs will require signed MX RRs. > > [..] Without signed MX RRs, many sites will not take advantage of DANE > TLSA RRs for the corresponding MX hosts even if present.
That's what I meant. > That's different from requiring the MX > RRset to be signed in the first place. Yes. Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
