> On Sep 2, 2015, at 3:18 PM, Jakob Schlyter <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 2 sep 2015, at 16:41, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I thought that there was a recent rough consensus to hash, but if
>> there's not, it is not clear that we have enought information to
>> choose between "a" and "c".
> 
> Consensus was declared by the chairs August 6th 2015 in [1] and both the 
> OpenPGP and S/MIME drafts has been updated since. I believe/hope Olafur's 
> revisit in this thread sought to clarify the pre-consensus options, not to 
> stir things up again.
> 
>       jakob
> 
> 
> [1] Message-ID: 
> <cahw9_iktt9-1w4bksunqop5wh1mrzpc9m-wiibswvmbd3z7...@mail.gmail.com>

To clarify 
The chairs were trying to clarify the background of their consensus call. 
We are not trying to change consensus at this point in the working group. 

The OPENPGP document is in IETF last call, if the chairs made the wrong call 
please put that comment to the IETF last call 
thread. 

   Olafur


_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to