On 1/13/16, 2:04 AM, "Viktor Dukhovni" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:42:21AM -0000, John Levine wrote: > >> > ... But what's the real benefit to all this? >> >> You're avoiding name collisions down the road. > >Please don't get me wrong, I'm not zealous about this, just don't >yet see any value in the additional labels, and surely we should >add them for a good reason. I would expect the RRtype to provide >all the collision avoidance that's required. Plus the fact that >these are intended to be host-specific records, while, the various >proposed example collisions are generally published at the parent >domain of the various hosts. RRtype is sufficient for collision avoidance, I don¹t think we gain any practical benefit by adding the other labels. <snip> _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
