>RRtype is sufficient for collision avoidance, I don�t think we gain >any practical benefit by adding the other labels.
Oh, OK. How about inventing a TLSACLIENT RRtype and use no prefix labels at all? I don't think that's a very good idea, but I'd be interested to hear if other people agree, and if so, why. R's, John
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
