On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9 Jul 2016, at 11:15, John Levine wrote: > >> Section 3 is wrong > > > The wording in this draft matches the wording in draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey > that has IETF consensus. Get over it.
Yup. Much of the WG (including, I believe, both chairs and the authors of both -smime and openpgp) does not like the consensus in draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey -- however, this was the consensus, and we really don't need to relitigate it. W > > --Paul Hoffman > > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
