I have read the document and while not perfect (what is in life?), I
support its publication.
Scott
On 24 Jul 2016, at 17:06, Warren Kumari wrote:
Dear Everyone,
A reminder that this WGLC closes tomorrow -- so far we have not really
seen sufficient feedback on this document. PLEASE review this document
and provide comment.
I also wanted to make sure people (including the authors) had seen:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg08382.html
W
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]>
wrote:
Dear Colleagues
The editors of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smime/ have
requested a WGLC,
the chairs are satisfied that the document is in good shape. This
message
starts a three week WG LC,
that concludes on Monday July 25 23:59 UTC (we have extended the
usual 2 weeks because of the upcoming meeting, travel, etc).
This document is on the Experimental track, it is a close relative of
a
prior document from our group
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey/ which
is in
AUTH-48 at this point.
Any discussions on “local part” other than to point out a
difference between
the OPENPGP document and this one are
out of scope.
Any other issues should be brought forward
thanks
Olafur & Warren
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
---maf
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
==================================
Scott Rose, NIST
[email protected]
ph: +1-301-975-8439
Google Voice: +1-571-249-3671
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
