Reminder the WGLC ends on the 28’th.
We have had civil discussion on this potentially explosive topic and I want to 
thank all for that. 

thanks
Olafur


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Olafur Gudmundsson" <o...@ogud.com>
> Subject: [dane] Second WGLC draft-ietf-dane-smime
> Date: November 14, 2016 at 12:47:44 AM EST
> To: "Dane WG" <dane@ietf.org>
> 
> Dear colleagues, 
>  
> We did the first WGLC in July 9 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/AjUjw-EXbSt3nlEqt-bvvIacDZM 
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/AjUjw-EXbSt3nlEqt-bvvIacDZM>
> There was some discussion but the chairs did not receive enough feedback to 
> judge consensus. 
> Editors have updated the document to reflect feedback received during the 
> first WGLC 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/lu5PGEBkgpvJA0kHG0u-Q_o7BDk 
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/lu5PGEBkgpvJA0kHG0u-Q_o7BDk>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-smime-12 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-smime-12>
> 
> We have published a document that relates to the experimental use of PGP keys 
> with DANE  RFC7929
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7929 
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7929>
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/7hRc1QDlP-i__415-VylSXiwsLE 
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/7hRc1QDlP-i__415-VylSXiwsLE>
> Many portions of this document are similar to RFC7929 - we realize that many 
> people do not like the consensus in that document, but please do not re-open 
> that discussion here.
> Just like RFC7929, this is an EXPERIMENTAL RFC.
> This is a second WGLC where the chairs ask the following question 
> Do you support the publication of this document as an EXPERIMENTAL RFC? 
> This WGLC will end on 28-11-2016 at 23:59 UTC 
> The document is “equivalent” to RFC7929.
> Thus In the Chairs judgement:  Only serious objections that do not apply to 
> 7929. need to be raised to prevent advancement of  this ID.  
> Please state on the mailing list that you have reviewed the document and 
> RFC7929 and given the criteria above the document is ready to be published. 
> If you have concerns related to the descriptions in the ID please flag those 
> as such. 
> Olafur & Warren 
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> dane@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
dane@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to