> Attached is my attempt at implementing this as an --interactive option
> to changes,

It looks very useful to me, so I'm applyting it notwithstanding your doubts.

> Specifically, I'm curious if "s <- slurp_recorded repository" in
> Changes.lhs is the correct slurpy to pass in.  The value isn't
> actually used (with_any_selected_changes ignores the slurpy parameter)
> but it probably should contain the correct value either way.

David, Ian, could either of your clarify that?  My gut instinct is
that we should remove the extra argument unless someone can explain
what purpose it was meant to serve.

                                        Juliusz


_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel

Reply via email to