>>> Specifically, I'm curious if "s <- slurp_recorded repository" in
>>> Changes.lhs is the correct slurpy to pass in.  The value isn't
>>> actually used (with_any_selected_changes ignores the slurpy parameter)

> I think it's on its way to allowing you to see context of patches while
> you select.

Ah, okay.  So it looks like the value currently being passed is the
right one.

Thanks for your help.

                                        Juliusz

_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel

Reply via email to