>> Upgrading to a later version of GHC works (namely, 6.4.1 fixes it, but
>> you might as well go with 6.6 if you're going to do that)
> I personally would still fix it [...]
> So I guess it boils down to a trade-off between the work it takes to
> accept the work-around patch and the work it takes to make all those
> n00bs shut up and fix the problem themselves. :-)
Working around it is no big deal (it's a 2 line patch that was
published on this list). The issue is that if we work around it,
we're implicitly committing to avoiding this GHC 6.4.0 bug in future
Darcs code. Which is highly uncool.
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
