On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:09:17AM -0700, Justin Bailey wrote:
> On 6/14/07, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Why replace three more powerful options with a single less powerful option
> >that also complicates the build process (not the configure script, but the
> >sequence that user must go through to compile darcs)? I do hope that at a
> >minimum the new patch allows us to compile without HTTP support?
> 
> I think the build process is less  complex with this library. In order
> to create the patch, I needed to build darcs on Windows. It was
> definitely a non-trivial process (see these instructions on the wiki:
> http://darcs.net/DarcsWiki/BuildingUnderWindows). Libcurl was a small
> but fragile portion of it. I needed to download a library, ensure it
> was built correctly itself, and then, because my MinGW installation
> had some strange paths, I needed to be sure to pass the right compiler
> flags to configure (CPPFLAGS & LDFLAGS). At least with the HTTP
> library, the download and install is pretty straightforward due to
> Cabal packagin, and no extra flags are required.

Compiling anything on windows is a pain, but you didn't need to install
libcurl.  Without libcurl, darcs works fine as long as either curl or wget
is in your path.  Unless for some reason the curl/wget support is broken on
windows?
-- 
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel

Reply via email to