Hi Thorkil, Thanks very much for this comment! I had not considered that.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:18:26 +0200, Thorkil Naur wrote: > I believe that my ability to do this was important to convince my ISP to look > hard at this problem. So I would suggest such events to be taken into > consideration when deciding whether alternative means of communicating should > be retained. Would the loss of this functionality be acceptable if darcs had some kind of extra verbose mode, where it printed out all the patches it was trying to get? Or would calling wget still be useful/more flexible for other reasons? In any case, in light of the the ftp stuff (David's mail), I am now less inclined to accept this patch right away. -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
pgp6vWH8vvFRa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
