Jamie Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I agree with the rest of what you said though. A patch is considered a > derived work,
Are you sure? Is there legal precedence on this? Are you willing to bet the cost of a copyright lawsuit? I find it strange that something I write isn't mine to do what I want with -- even if it is a modification to something else. (But then I find a lot of so-called intellectual property strange) > and the GPL states that by distributing a derived work, > you implicitly GPL that work Agreed. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
