On Saturday 25 June 2005 13:42, David Roundy wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:31:16PM -0400, via RT wrote: > > The conclusion was that filenames should be displayed relative to the > > pruning directory. > > This isn't so clear to me.
My proposal on the darcs-user ML (which IIRC most people agreed with) was to have darcs what print output relative to the repo-root, and without the './' at the start. alternatively a darcs what $foo $bar will print output like A $foo/baz M $bar/baz Effectively all output of a whatsnew with argument dirs will be relative to the working dir and therefor will need to be distinctive to have the argument in front of all output so its really relative to the current dir. There was an alternative proposal that basically puts a "./" in front of every entry in a relative-dir listing to make it distinct that we are now listing a current dir. So; cd src darcs whatsnew foo will print M ./foo/baz and darcs whatsnew will print M src/foo/baz Hope this explains the proposal a bit better :) -- Thomas Zander
pgpDcPa7mU15j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
