On Monday 01 August 2005 04:15, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > >>>>> "Tommy" == Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tommy> Last time, I remember, 'drop' was a winning new name for > Tommy> 'unpull'. > > Make that "drop-on-the-floor-so-the-dog-eats-it". > > I'm in full agreement with David on any name that doesn't clearly > indicate that something destructive is being specified (unless, of > course, it isn't destructive, which more or less restricts you to > "unpull" :-). Revision control systems are presumed to be > nondestructive, so I think it should be made really clear.
If everybody will be surprised by the patch just vanishing, then why do we actually want to make it vanish in the first place? We could introduce a directory /deleted-patches and put a copy of the patch there. This way it could be resurrected with "darcs undelete". -erik -- Erik Schnetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.aei.mpg.de/~eschnett/ My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.
pgppWoXCrYGD0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
