On 8/21/05, Erik Schnetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think one should dismiss an idea from a darcs user like that.
First of all, I'm not dismissing the idea, just giving my equally valid view that adding it as a command to darcs isn't necessary. And I'm not alone in that belief. In fact, I belief in that so much that I'd be happy to write the relevant wrapper script and donate it to be included with darcs. > It may be that the people who don't like the idea don't have the > problem of knowing whether a repository still contains data that don't > exist anywhere else, but this question is quite interesting in general > when you have potentially many distributed repositories. Whether this > is implemented in darcs, or via a wrapper script, or implicitly through > "good workflow" does not matter. The problem should somehow be > discussed in a darcs introduction. That's a good idea too. Michael _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
