> 2. If the user tries to access older information (before the last
> checkpoint), darcs would then get the previous checkpoint, rebuild
> the history and give the user the requested information.
You're perfectly right, and it looks like we're inconsistent in what
we're doing:
- we don't use checkpoints in Diff;
- we used to use checkpoints in surelySlurpPristine, but then someone
broke the code;
- we do use checkpoints in Check.
Concerning the second point, surely_Slurp_Current dated 20 January 2005
groks checkpoints. It's now called surelySlurpPristine, and ignores
checkpoints splendidly. David, Ian, Tomasz, does any of you remember
what happened? Do I still have time to sneak a fix into 1.0.4?
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
