About checkpoints, is there a chance to see the bug in "darcs get
--partial" fixed soon ?
The test to see that bug is really simple:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] darcs]$ ./darcs get --partial --tag=1.0.3
http://www.abridgegame.org/repos/darcs/
Welcome to the darcs darcs repository!
This is the stable release branch.
**********************
Directory '/home/glehmann/tmp/darcs/darcs' already exists, creating
repository as '/home/glehmann/tmp/darcs/darcs_0'
Copying patch 121 of 121... done!
Applying patch 120 of 120... done.
darcs: failed to read patch in get_extra:
Sun Jul 31 14:04:58 CEST 2005 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* add changelog entry and building darcsgit section to manual.
Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] darcs]$
Regards,
Gaetan
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:44:27 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. If the user tries to access older information (before the last
checkpoint), darcs would then get the previous checkpoint, rebuild
the history and give the user the requested information.
You're perfectly right, and it looks like we're inconsistent in what
we're doing:
- we don't use checkpoints in Diff;
- we used to use checkpoints in surelySlurpPristine, but then someone
broke the code;
- we do use checkpoints in Check.
Concerning the second point, surely_Slurp_Current dated 20 January 2005
groks checkpoints. It's now called surelySlurpPristine, and ignores
checkpoints splendidly. David, Ian, Tomasz, does any of you remember
what happened? Do I still have time to sneak a fix into 1.0.4?
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
--
Gaëtan Lehmann
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
