On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 06:17:20PM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Sunday 30 October 2005 17:36, Albert Reiner wrote: > > Somehow I have come to expect that all darcs commands that actually > > modify anything come with a --dry-run option. > > Well, almost none of them do. :) There is no inconsistency here, like you > clearly expected. > > You can revert your applied changes with various darcs commands with > ease.
I don't know, I think this isn't a bad idea. darcs command --dry-run is a nice uniform way of getting information, and there's actually no way to query the contents of a patch bundle (although you could always just read it with less...). -- David Roundy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
