> XDR or XML-RPC sound intimidating to me, and seem like very big sticks with > which to whack a very small problem--input to darcs. XML output from darcs > makes tons of sense, but I'd prefer to keep input to darcs much simpler.
This is true. XML output of darcs is much more of use than input. This is even more important as darcs command interface seems to change once in a while and XML output may be a more stable making result parsing a lot easier and not so prone to errors. And even if new features are added to XML they may not introduce any errors to existing solutions. Cheers, Radek. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
